Friday, May 6, 2011

DHS Statement on Threat to Rail System

A possible plot to attack our rail system on this year's 10th anniversary of 9/11 was found in items retrieved from bin Laden's compound.  The notes included specific instructions to cause derailments by tampering with the tracks.

Train security received extra focus after the arrest of  Najibullah Zazi and disruption of his backpack bomb plot against the New York train system on 9/11/09.  This operation led to increased screening at major train stations around the country, including random bag checks and extra security.  Perhaps in response to Zazi's failed operation, bin Laden and al Qaeda developed the train derailment plot in Feb 2010.   Here is the DHS statement, not much here but at least acknowledging concern. 

"DHS issued an intelligence message May 5 to its federal, state, local and tribal partners about potential Al-Qa'ida contemplation in February 2010 of plots against the U.S. rail sector. For the same reason, the Transportation Security Administration will issue a bulletin to rail sector stakeholders. We have no information of any imminent terrorist threat to the U.S. rail sector, but wanted to make our partners aware of the alleged plotting; it is unclear if any further planning has been conducted since February of last year.
We want to stress that this alleged Al Qa’ida plotting is based on initial reporting, which is often misleading or inaccurate and subject to change. We remain at a heightened state of vigilance, but do not intend to issue an NTAS alert at this time. We will issue alerts only when we have specific or credible information to convey to the American public. Our security posture, which always includes a number of measures both seen and unseen, will continue to respond appropriately to protect the American people from an evolving threat picture both in the coming days and beyond.
Since Sunday, DHS and its partners have taken a number of actions, including but not limited to: reviewing protective measures for all potential terrorist targets, including critical infrastructure and transportation systems across the country; deploying additional officers to non-secured areas at our nation’s airports; and identifying any new targeting rules that should be instituted to strengthen the ways we assess the risk of both passengers and cargo coming to the United States.
As always, we urge our state, local, tribal and private sector partners, as well as the general public, to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity to federal, state or local law enforcement."

DHS statement

5 comments:

Jeff Hawkins said...

To paraphrase Joel Rosenberg from his book Epicenter, it was not the lack of intelligence per se, that failed us on 9/11, rather it was our ability to actually believe such an act could be carried out.

I tend to believe anything is possible now and if there is good intel, believe it can happen and take is seriously.

jm1347 said...

You are so right Jeff. What concerns me is that the amount of rail line in this country that have the surveillance of them is very weak. Especially since many trains are carrying hazardous chemical freight

Ghost Dancer said...

Gone are the days of old cold war thinking and one side or the other.Threats need to be looked at as coming from any direction.Not an easy task to counteract nor predict.

Ed C said...

In reading the daily DHS summary seems that two incidents in NYC highlight the issue when a man walked the rail lines from the WTC station to New Jersy before being apprehended and stating he planted a bomb along the way, or the arrest of some individuals entering a subway tunnel under construction fireworks and cameras to conduct a photo shoot with the firworks providing the lighting. In any case although no threat was uncovered. the continous release of information regarding our national vulnerabilities and operational capabilities will be our undoing.

jm1347 said...

Rail and other mass transportation means have always been targeted. Look back to the Madrid and London bombing. I saw a DHS memo from 2003/2004 time frame that addressed this issue.