Why do we have this system if we aren't going to use it? The overall threat to our country has been "elevated" since August 2005. The overall threat to aviation - "high" since August 2006. It was only "severe" once since 9/11, during that same month when officials uncovered a plot to bomb U.S. flights originating from the U.K. Even when the Christmas Day Bomber was nearly successful, the aviation scale didn't change. We should never assume a failed operation or unraveled plot is a "one off." What if it is merely a dry run or a distraction from a larger operation?
Since 9/11, we've had over 55 domestics plots (by my count, and only what I can find in open source reporting). Over half of those plots/operations were in the last 2 years. The worst of which were in the last 12 months with Nidal Hassan, the Christmas Day bomber Abdumullatab, the Times Square Bomber Shahzad, NY subway backpack bomber Zazi, and now the would-be D.C. Metro bomber Ahmed. Throw in terror plots in Texas and Illinois, Jihad Jane, the father/son team in North Carolina, the would-be synagogue attackers in NYC, the group that traveled to Pakistan for training. Now a shooter in D.C. that has 4 events under his belt - returning last night to the Marine Corps Memorial to punctuate his earlier attack.
It is time to be honest with the American people - the threat is growing in our country. Al Qaeda doesn't view unsuccessful operations and foiled plots as failures -- but as learning opportunities. They are masters of observation and improve incrementally. They will push forward, undeterred, until the operation is a success.
We are responding predictably -- and they are approaching us asymmetrically. Therefore we have to use everything in our arsenal to counter the threat. Raising the alert scale to "High" is a good thing for the law enforcement and intelligence communities - here are some random thoughts as to why.
- By raising the alert, the American public would be snapped out of their catatonic state. Right now, Dancing With the Stars is more important than the fact we have terror cells and radicalized American Lone Wolves in our country that are preparing to move to operational stage.
- This wake up call immediately makes them force multipliers. Right now, the burden is solely on law enforcement and intelligence to watch for out-of-the-ordinary things and people. They think we have enough resources to do the job and don't need their help.
- The truth is, we need a public that engages in threat reduction, they should be on our team. After all, they are on the target list - why shouldn't they engage? And do so under our guidance? To get average citizens on the detection and mitigation team, they first need to realize there is a growing threat. Then they need education on how to report and intervene. Otherwise, the blinders will be on. Citizens and business owners are certainly are seeing "things", but if not put into the larger context, they can't help us. Consider this - the plots we are currently unraveling are not coming from leads generated by the public. Hassan was at the range constantly for weeks, shooting at silhouette targets and working on his head shots. Zazi was buying cases of hydrogen peroxide from beauty parlors. Terrorists plan, they purchase things, they practice, they perform surveillance. There are opportunities to detect them, we need to exploit every avenue.
- After living in the UK on two separate occasions for almost 4 years total, I've seen firsthand how the British government handles terrorist threats. #1 - they tell their citizens. People don't panic, they still go about their business, riding the subway, flying, etc. But they also become eyes and ears for law enforcement and they are savvy on how to handle the threat. It is part of their daily life. They are living with the threat, not dying from it - by "die", I mean hemorrhaging resources and living in fear.
- If we don't warn our citizens and a terrorist attack is successful, they will be over reliant on us for support. We should tell them to prepare and educate themselves now. This should be done in a way that doesn't cause panic. But they need to know what "shelter in place" means in the event of a chem, bio or nuke event. They should have water, batteries, and nonperishable food to take care of themselves and their families in the event the power grid is hit, or we need to lock down a city in a Mumbai type of situation.
- If the advisory system never changes, it is a useless tool that could actually contribute to complacency. "Elevated" means a severe risk of terrorist attack yet you wouldn't know that by talking to the average person on the street. A recent poll indicated that terrorism is ranked last when it comes to the concerns of average Americans.
We have three major challenges with regards to fighting terror on our soil: the public is not educated on the threat. They have no idea how to take care of themselves. And we are resource constrained, and won't be able to provide the support they will expect during an emergency.
The overall terrorist threat is "high" in our country. Either we need to use this advisory system -- or lose it.
